At AlbaCore, we focus on the long-term. As one of Europe’s leading alternative credit specialists, we invest in private capital solutions, opportunistic and dislocated credit, and structured products.
Discover moreInvestment strategies
Insights
Specialist in Asia Pacific, China, India and South East Asia and Global Emerging Market equities.
Discover more
Our philosophy is very simple. We are constantly searching for high quality businesses and when we acquire them, we will work relentlessly with them to create long-term sustainable value through innovation, ESG-led and proactive asset management.
Discover moreInvestment strategies
Insights
Leader in active quantitative equities across Australian equities, global equities, emerging markets and global small companies.
Backed by a unique blend of research, portfolio construction and risk management, focused on uncovering original insights and translating them into investment strategies that are active and systematic, aiming to generate alpha.
Discover moreInvestment strategies
Insights
Specialists in equity portfolios in Asia Pacific, emerging markets, global and sustainable investment strategies
Discover more
What is First Sentier Investors doing?
We are playing an active role in the transition to a low-carbon economy by managing investment risks, identifying opportunities and driving change through our stewardship approach.
We support the global transition to net zero emissions in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement, and in 2022, we made a public commitment in relation to net zero targets.
We are committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions across investment portfolios in line with a target of net zero emissions by 2050 (or sooner) and across business operations in line with a target of net zero emissions by 2030 (or sooner).
This includes a range of targets committed to by investment teams over the short, medium and long term and an aim to increase the proportion of assets covered by formal net zero commitments over time1.
The 5 C's of Climate Action
Our net zero transition strategy is detailed in our Climate Action Plan (CAP), which was launched in 2022 and includes details on our investment and operational alignment.
We have summarised our approach as ‘The 5 C’s of Climate Action’.
Company engagement
We will use our influence and proxy voting to influence companies and we will allocate capital to help accelerate the climate transition.
Collaboration
We will continue to support climate-related industry collaborations, climate policies, and regulation, to drive systemic change.
Clients
We aim to be a trusted partner who can support clients in their transition to a low carbon economy.
Clarity
We will be transparent about our progress on reaching net zero, and provide evidence for any climate-related claims we make.
Corporate sustainability
We are decarbonising our business operations through a broad range of initiatives, and will report on progress.
In response to various global regulations and guidance coming into force, we implemented a comprehensive Climate Risk Management Plan (CRMP), which sets out a pathway for our governance and oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities, our strategy and risk management approach, and the metrics we are tracking and targets we have set. The CRMP is based on the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework. Our updated TCFD aligned disclosures are available in our firm-level Climate Change Statement (CCS), and in investment team level CCS’s.
Going forward, we will regularly report on our progress against net zero commitment at firm and investment team levels. The CCS and CAP can be found on our website, along with each investment team’s respective net zero targets.
We have also upgraded our interactive climate risk dashboard to include a broader range of climate-related metrics as recommended by the TCFD. This information is available to our investment teams, other teams across the business, senior management and clients. We plan to make it publicly available on our website in 2023.
1. The commitments and targets set out in this webpage are current as of the date of publication. Such commitments and targets are based in part on information and representations made to FSI by portfolio companies, together with assumptions in relation to future matters such as government policy implementation in ESG and other climate-related areas, enhanced future technology and the actions of portfolio companies. As such, achievement of these commitments and targets depend on the ongoing accuracy of such information and representations (which may prove to be inaccurate) and the realisation of such future matters (which are not guaranteed).
Global Property Securities - Embodied carbon in buildings
The Global Property Securities team is committed to achieving our net zero targets. However, the full scope of the real estate sector’s contribution to global carbon emissions has not been fully quantified, which creates challenges in achieving this goal.
We believe that Scope 1 & 2 emissions data only gives a partial picture of property portfolio emissions and does not provide for full landlord accountability. Our carbon analysis is based on all owned real estate, including whether the energy is ‘controlled’ by the landlord or where it may be ‘non-controlled’. For instance, a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) may only own a minority stake in an asset or be in a leasing arrangement where the tenant has direct control of energy (typically under triple net lease contracts), which we see impacting the level of disclosures available to the market.
Currently, the built environment does not have a standardised methodology to account for the full range of Scope 3 and embodied carbon emissions, such as those associated with modernisation programmes. However, we view this as a key contributor to a building’s carbon emissions. Our investment process considers all emissions listed below and seeks company data on them:
- Scope 1: Direct GHG emissions occur from sources that are owned or controlled by the company, for example, emissions from combustion in owned or controlled boilers, furnaces, vehicles, etc.
- Scope 2: Accounts for GHG emissions from the generation of purchased electricity consumed by the company. Purchased electricity is defined as electricity that is purchased or otherwise brought into the organizational boundary of the company.
- Scope 3: Is an optional reporting category that allows for the treatment of all other indirect emissions. Scope 3 emissions are a consequence of the activities and operation of the reporting company within its value chain.
REITs have higher reporting standards in comparison to private owners and are therefore more scrutinised than their private counterparts.
We believe REITs are well-placed to standardise the measurement of Scope 3 and embodied carbon emissions, which will flow through to the rest of the built environment. Hence, we have taken steps to position ourselves to drive change in our investment universe and encourage REITs to set more ambitious net zero goals.
Through comprehensive research, we developed a tool1 capable of undertaking high level analysis on all embodied carbon associated with development, redevelopment, and maintenance capital expenditure programmes at a company level.
As a result of our in-depth carbon analysis, we are now able to identify issues and to form a measurable carbon reduction target in our engagement process with companies. We are planning to continue our engagement and reporting on the issue going forward.
1. Ernst & Young was engaged by First Sentier Investors Global Property Securities team to undertake ‘limited assurance’ as defined by International Auditing Standards, over the team’s Portfolio Operational Carbon Emissions (Scope 1 and 2) Forecast to Net Zero for the year ended 30 June 2021. Based on the review, Ernst & Young determined the forecast was prepared and presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with the defined Criteria.
Stewart Investors - Project Drawdown
Founded in 2014, Project Drawdown® is a non-profit organisation that seeks to help the world reach “drawdown” — the future point in time when levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere stop climbing and start to steadily decline.
Project Drawdown’s framework aims to connect substantive and existing solutions to stop climate change by reducing sources, supporting carbon sinks and improving society. Through rigorous and ongoing research, they have catalogued more than 90 climate change solutions which, if scaled up, can deliver the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C temperature goal. The full set of solutions, along with the research that backs them, is publicly available at www.drawdown.org.
Drawdown’s solutions offer both breadth and depth of decarbonisation- enabling investments and Stewart Investors utilises the solutions to help them understand the role companies can play in climate solutions and the contribution they can make to reducing emissions.
In investment terms, the abatement potential for these technologies can be thought of as “total addressable markets”, with some offering significant growth potential for companies (tailwinds), while on the flipside, some will point to significant declines in existing industries and practices (headwinds).
Viewing these areas in conjunction with other sustainable development challenges shows the cross-cutting nature of the carbon abatement challenge and consequent opportunities.
Stewart Investors seeks to map investments against the more than 90 solutions which are captured in eight broader solutions (Buildings, Circular economy/industry, Conservation/restoration, Energy, Food system, Human development, Transport and Water) shown in the chart to the right. The team’s focus is on whether the companies themselves are making a meaningful contribution and will have meaningful involvement with the delivery of any of those solutions.
In practice
Stewart Investors recently commissioned research into smallholder farmers, which found there are more than 500 million smallholder farmers globally producing up to 80% of some key commodities like palm oil, coffee and cocoa1. These farmers are also at the frontlines of a significant amount of agriculture-related deforestation.
Of Project Drawdown’s c.90 solutions, 22 are directly relevant to smallholder farmers, offering more than 540 gigatons of abatement potential or 34% of the total2. In this context, poverty alleviation, human rights and secure tenure of land for smallholder farmers are critical for delivering climate change solutions.
Stewart Investors publicly discloses the contributions being made by investee companies on its interactive Portfolio Explorer tool.
Figure 4. Drawdown solutions contributed to 1.5°C
1. Stewart Investors and Project Drawdown solutions data. Gigatons CO2 Equivalent Reduced/Sequestered (2020–2050)
2. NIRAS-LTS research for Stewart Investors.
The data set out above are estimates based on data sourced by First Sentier Investors. This data is current as at 31/12/2022. It is based on information and representations sourced from third parties (including portfolio companies), which may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. No assurance is given or liability accepted regarding the accuracy, validity or completeness of this data and no reliance should be placed on it by any third party.
Challenges
A key challenge for investors has been the rapidly evolving regulatory environment on mandatory climate disclosure across many global markets. While most initiatives are aligned to the TCFD, most local disclosure frameworks have unique requirements, and some are significantly more prescriptive than others.
As a global investment manager, we need to comply with a multitude of different disclosure requirements. Although this is challenging, we have welcomed the additional guidance, and the opportunity to uplift our approach globally.
The quality and availability of data reported by investee companies and collated by ESG data providers remains a challenge for investors. For example, Oil and Gas reporting entities disclose Scope 1 emissions based on either operational control or equity share. Individual data providers choose one of these, which can make it difficult to compare. Another example is where some data providers release GHG emissions data following companies’ reporting cycles, while others update their data sets annually. We therefore welcome further guidance from the TCFD and the PCAF to create a more standardised industry approach and have worked closely with our data providers on these topics in 2022.
 |  |
|---|