Close

Specialist in Asia Pacific, Japan, China, India and South East Asia and Global Emerging Market equities.

Discover more
Close

Our philosophy is very simple. We are constantly searching for high quality businesses and when we acquire them, we will work relentlessly with them to create long-term sustainable value through innovation, ESG-led and proactive asset management.

Discover more
Close

Stewart Investors manage investment portfolios on behalf of our clients over the long term and have held shares in some companies for over 20 years. They launched their first investment strategy in 1988.

Discover more

Asian Quality Bond Monthly review and outlook

Asian Quality Bond Monthly review and outlook

A monthly review and outlook of the Asian Quality Bond market.

Market review - as at May 2022

The Asian investment grade credit returned 0.49% in May, rally in US treasury more than offset credit spread widening, following a broader fall in risky assets. Asia Investment Grade (IG) spreads widened by 8bps to 201bps. A combination of China’s weak macro backdrop with its zero-Covid policy and heavy outflows from Emerging Market (EM) bonds kept Asia credit spreads elevated. We believe that Asian credit still offers decent value relative to the broader credit market, though we remain selective in credits that are able to ride through this volatility.

In China, the policy tone developed positively over the month, as the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) signaled the market to provide reasonable financing support for bond issuances from Chinese developers. The People’s Bank of China (PBoC) also cut the five-year loan prime rate by 15bps to 4.45%, lowering home financing costs. This policy easing helped support overall sentiment in the property sector particularly amongst higher quality issuers. Encouragingly, Longfor and Country Garden announced plans to issue RMB500mn (US$74.8mn) of onshore bonds with credit protections features.

China asset management companies (AMCs) witnessed a mix of headlines. Greatwall AMC delayed announcing their 2021 financial results, leading to bouts of sell-off amongst AMCs, a situation similar to what was seen with Huarong in 2021. The news led to a widening spread of Greatwall bonds although later on, the company confirmed that they were operating normally and indicated to release their financial result by 30 June 2022. China Cinda, another government-supported AMC, had its USD bonds downgraded by Moody’s to Baa1 on the back of deterioration of profitability, worsening capital adequacy, and rising risks from sizeable property exposure. In contrast, Huarong announced a proposal to issue up to RMB20bn (US$3bn) of additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital and will hold extraordinary shareholders meeting in the middle of June. If successful, it will improve its capital adequacy ratio closer to its peers. The bonds rallied across the curve. We continue to hold our view that these AMCs play an important role to China’s economy and governmental support will remain intact. We maintain our overweight bias for Huarong.

In the sovereign space, spreads widened on heavy EM hard currency outflows and poor market sentiment. Asia IG sovereign fundamentals remain intact despite the broader market sell-off in the first half of the month. As rates stabilized, the Indonesian government managed to issue its biggest dual-tranche Sukuk of US$3.25bn at an attractive pricing, which was 3x oversubscribed. We hold a mild positive stance for IG-rated sovereigns such as Indonesia and the Philippines while avoiding frontier markets.

Overall volume in the Asia primary issuance market remained subdued, as the risk-off tone and rate volatility dampened issuers’ appetite. Issuance came primarily from IG issuers with high new issuance premiums to attract demand. Notable issuances included a dual-tranche US$3.25bn Indonesia Sukuk, US$500mn China Merchants Port Holdings, US$350mn Exim Bank of Thailand and US$550mn ENN Energy issuances.

Q2 2022 investment outlook

Such a meaningful repricing in the US Treasury market was unsurprising given the strength and persistence of inflation. Headline CPI in the US remained stubbornly high throughout the quarter, with escalating geopolitical tensions adding to already disrupted supply chains. Specifically, the Russia-Ukraine war pushed up oil, commodity and food prices and fed through to heightened inflationary expectations going forward.

Many market participants are likening the current interest rate outlook in the US to the rate hiking cycle in 1994. It is important to note, however, that inflation at that time was lower than it is now, and that the Federal Reserve was not as far behind the curve as it appears to be today. Moreover, we have not seen a stagflationary environment since the 1970s; few investors have experienced conditions like we are seeing now in their careers. The ongoing Covid situation and the Russia-Ukraine conflict are adding to the complexity in analysing and navigating markets.

The military conflict in Eastern Europe is now into its second month and could have meaningful implications for Asia if it persists. The war has already disrupted oil and commodity supplies, resulting in a sharp increase in prices. This will likely act as a pressure point for external balances; with the exception of Malaysia, most Asian economies are net commodity importers. India and Philippines appear most at risk. While Indonesia will end up having a higher energy import bill, this should be partially offset by its higher exports of other commodities including palm oil, coal and base metals. We have witnessed some weakening of the Indian rupee and Indonesian rupiah and the central banks might have to intervene with more aggressive rate hikes if the weakness persists. The more open economies in Asia — including South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan — all started their monetary policy normalisation path in Q3 last year and are set to continue. Indonesia and Malaysia are expected to raise rates in Q2, while the Philippines and Thailand will likely follow suit later in the year. All are expected to normalise policy settings gradually, but the probability of them having to move more quickly than expected has undoubtedly increased.

In the US, the Biden administration seems determined to reduce the budget deficit, unwinding several years of excesses during the Trump Presidency. This means monetary and fiscal policies are both becoming more restrictive at a time when the world is grappling with the uncertainties of the Covid-19 pandemic and the Ukraine conflict. The likelihood of stagflation in the US has therefore increased, as suggested by the Treasury yield curve. The curve inverted briefly in March, with yields on 2-year notes rising above those on comparable 10-year securities. We are seeing similar inflationary pressure in Europe, suggesting the European Central Bank will have to bring forward its own rate hiking cycle. Elsewhere, while inflation in Japan remains below the central bank’s 2% target, the recent rise in Japanese Government Bond yields could be a warning signal for financial markets that the Bank of Japan will also eventually act, following many years of ultra-easy monetary policy.

On a more positive note, the recently concluded China National People’s Congress meeting confirmed a commitment by the Government to target GDP growth of 5.5%. This appears optimistic, in our view, given the ongoing contraction in the property sector, which is estimated to account for at least 20% of GDP. The high likelihood of further large-scale lockdowns owing to China’s ‘zero tolerance’ approach to Covid-19 also suggests Government policy will be pro-growth in the months ahead. Support will likely come in the form of targeted fiscal stimulus, while monetary policy will likely remain accommodative. We are also comforted by an easing in policy stance, following months of downturn in the property sector. A relaxation in local policy settings seems likely and overall financing conditions for property firms should improve in the months ahead. Debt restructuring in Kaisa and Evergrande (expected in the second half of the year) could provide more clarity for the path ahead for other developers, thereby boosting sentiment towards the distressed sector.

Sentiment towards Chinese credits has been hampered by slowing GDP growth. We have also seen increased regulation across several sectors including property, education and technology. The possible delisting of Chinese technology stocks listed in the US and concerns around US sanctions should China invade Taiwan are also eroding investors’ confidence. While many of these concerns are warranted, some of the associated spread widening appears to have been overdone. Accordingly, we are seeing some value emerging, especially in the technology space and in selected State Owned Enterprises.

Asian investment grade spreads closed the quarter at +192bps, close to the five-year average. Current valuations therefore seem fair given the prevailing uncertain environment globally. That said, following the recent increase in US Treasury yields, the ‘all in’ yield for Asian investment grade credit is above 4%. This presents an appealing potential return, particularly for long-term investors.

Valuations in the Asian high yield sector remain at depressed levels, hampered by the Chinese high yield property sector. We continue to look for further signs of stabilisation in this space, which will include a return to the new issuance market for certain developers alongside debt restructuring plans for Evergrande and Kaisa. A rebound in the Chinese high yield property sector could have a positive spillover impact for the broader Asian investment grade market.

As for Asian currencies, we are maintaining a cautious stance given the imminent rate hiking cycles in the US and Europe. The US dollar is likely to remain strong relative to Asian currencies against a background of quantitative tightening by the Federal Reserve, which is expected to start soon. We also see some potential upside in Asian rates in the coming quarter, as markets do not appear to have adequately priced in more aggressive rate hiking scenarios from various Asian central banks.

 

Source : Company data, First Sentier Investors, as of end of May 2022

 

Important Information

Investment involves risks, past performance is not a guide to future performance. Refer to the offering documents of the respective funds for details, including risk factors. The information contained within this material has been obtained from sources that First Sentier Investors (“FSI”) believes to be reliable and accurate at the time of issue but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information. To the extent permitted by law, neither FSI, nor any of its associates, nor any director, officer or employee accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss arising directly or indirectly from any use of this. It does not constitute investment advice and should not be used as the basis of any investment decision, nor should it be treated as a recommendation for any investment. The information in this material may not be edited and/or reproduced in whole or in part without the prior consent of FSI.

This material is issued by First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. First Sentier Investors is a business name of First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited.

Reference to specific securities (if any) is included for the purpose of illustration only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the same. All securities mentioned herein may or may not form part of the holdings of First Sentier Investors’ portfolios at a certain point in time, and the holdings may change over time.

First Sentier Investors (Hong Kong) Limited is part of the investment management business of First Sentier Investors, which is ultimately owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (“MUFG”), a global financial group. First Sentier Investors includes a number of entities in different jurisdictions.

To the extent permitted by law, MUFG and its subsidiaries are not responsible for any statement or information contained in this material. Neither MUFG nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of any investment or entity referred to in this material or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested.