Asian Fixed Income outlook

Market commentary

Market volatility intensified in March as the escalation of the Iran conflict and disruptions to Middle Eastern oil supply reignited inflation concerns. The sharp selloff in rates eclipsed the growth slowdown narrative that had dominated the early part of 2026. Over the quarter, U.S. 10-year Treasury yield rose 15 basis points (bps) to end the quarter at 4.32%, driven by the 38bps rise that took place in March on the back of inflation fears. The yield curve flattened as frontend rates bore the brunt of near-term inflation fears, with the 2s10s spread narrowing by -17bps to 52bps.

Asia investment grade credit markets remained resilient during the quarter despite elevated geopolitical risks linked to the Iran conflict. Spreads widened modestly by 8bpsto 110bps in March, reflecting heightened risk aversion rather than a broad‑based deterioration in underlying credit fundamentals. The primary regional risk relates to potential energy supply disruptions, given Asia’s reliance on oil and gas flows through the Straits of Hormuz. Early signs of pressure emerged through energy‑related policy responses, including fuel rationing measures in select countries, which could weigh on regional growth prospects and credit profiles if sustained.

Across investment grade sectors, idiosyncratic news continued to be the driver of credit events. Moody’s and Fitch revised Indonesia’s sovereign outlook to negative, citing concerns around policy credibility, rising fiscal risks, external buffers, and investor sentiment, with these pressures extending to certain quasi-sovereign issuers. In India, two public sector nonbank financial companies announced a proposed merger aimed at improving scale and operational efficiency, which may support medium-term credit strength. In China, rating agencies maintained a cautious stance on a delivery services company within the technology, media, and telecommunications (TMT) sector due to ongoing profitability pressures, weaker cash generation, and margin compression. Separately, an investment grade Chinese property developer also faces fallen angel risk after Standard & Poor's (S&P) revised its BBB outlook to negative, reflecting slower than expected deleveraging. Moody’s upgraded several offshore Chinese financial leasing companies, supported by expectations of strong parental and government backing. However, S&P placed one China leasing company at BBB- credit watch negative following a profit warning from its subsidiary. In Korea, S&P downgraded a steel producer on concerns that elevated capital expenditure and subdued operating conditions will constrain free cash flow, while outlooks on a battery manufacturer and a chemical company were revised to negative amid weaker electric vehicle demand and a prolonged chemicals downturn. Conversely, S&P upgraded a Korean memory chip manufacturer to BBB+ with a positive outlook, underpinned by robust earnings and cash flow driven by strong Artificial Intelligence (AI) related demand.

Asian non-investment grade US dollar credits remained resilient overall amid heightened geopolitical tensions, though performance continued to be shaped by issuer- and country-specific developments. Within China, the Middle East conflict has not materially affected consumer sentiment or Macau gaming activity, with a modest recovery evident in gaming revenues. However, issuer‑specific risks remain elevated, underscored by weakness in a Chinese industrial issuer after China’s National Financial Regulatory Administration advised onshore insurers to limit exposure to the company. In Japan, credit differentiation persisted, with a NAND flash memory producer positioned for a potential upgrade on the back of strong earnings momentum, while a Japanese investment company was placed on negative outlook due to balance sheet risks. At the sovereign level, Sri Lanka and Pakistan experienced significant bond sell‑offs, driven primarily by inflation concerns linked to higher oil prices following the Iran conflict, which have weighed on expectations for central bank rate cuts and increased fiscal pressures for these energy‑importing economies.

Performance review

The Asian Credit portfolio underperformed its benchmark in 1Q26:

Negative contributors:

  • Overweight in Indonesian quasi-sovereign bonds
  • Overweight exposure in Australian government bond
  • Currency positioning, particularly overweight in the Japanese yen, euro, and Australian dollar

Positive contributors:

  • Underweight in Indonesia and Philippine sovereign bonds
  • Security selection within China investment grade bonds
  • Security selection in Asian financial sector bonds

 

Strategy Positioning

The strategy maintained a cautious approach, keeping an underweight in credit spreads relative to its benchmark. In credit markets, holdings in China technology, media, and telecommunications issuers were reduced following a period of spread tightening. Japanese credit exposure was also scaled back amid increased volatility in Japanese government bonds, while exposure to the Middle East was further trimmed in response to elevated geopolitical uncertainty.

In rates positioning, the strategy was initially overweight U.S. duration. However, following heightened geopolitical tensions in March, U.S. duration exposure was shifted from overweight to underweight. At the same time, the Japanese rates position was reduced from overweight to neutral due to rising inflation expectations, while a modest exposure to Australian rates was maintained. In addition, the portfolio retained a small allocation to euro‑denominated credit, with euro exposure hedged back to the US Dollar during March. The strategy maintained its Japanese yen exposure and increased its Australian dollar exposure over the quarter.

Q2 outlook

Global / US

Even before the latest escalation in the Middle East, the U.S. economy had begun to exhibit signs of fatigue beneath otherwise resilient headline growth figures. Labor‑market indicators have softened noticeably, and consumption strength is increasingly concentrated among higher‑income cohorts rather than the middle‑income households that typically underpin broad‑based demand. With pandemic‑era savings exhausted and fiscal transfers now normalized, households no longer possess the buffers that previously supported elevated spending.

Our core view of a slowing U.S. growth trajectory remains unchanged, and energy driven price pressures are likely to cause a bigger drag on consumer sentiment and growth. Prior to the conflict, we expected roughly 100 basis points (bps) of additional the federal reserve (Fed) cuts in 2026. However, the inflation risk from a prolonged geopolitical shock could keep the Fed on hold for longer, and in a tail risk scenario even raise the possibility of rate hikes if inflation expectations become unanchored.

Even if tensions ease, we do not expect sentiment to swing sharply toward optimism in a sustained manner. As such, U.S. rate dynamics will ultimately depend on the interplay between conflict‑related inflation risks and ongoing domestic growth deterioration. At the long end, fiscal concerns and inflation fear may keep yields elevated, though weaker growth should exert some anchoring pressure. At the front end, the government’s policy response to inflation concerns will remain the dominant driver, reinforcing the need for a more tactical approach.

Equity valuations have become more fragile and risk sentiments oscillate headline‑to‑headline on geopolitical news. We still see the risk of renewed sell‑offs should the conflict escalate meaningfully. For fixed income investors, this environment reinforces the importance of disciplined credit allocation—focusing on quality and steering clear of stretched segments.

Asia

For the Bank of Japan, rising oil prices paired with an undervalued yen adds more certainty to its path of monetary policy normalization. We continue to expect policy rates to move toward 1.5–2%, with 10year Japanese Government bonds( JGBs) likely settling between 2–2.5%. Notably, 30year JGBs remain attractively valued, as Japan maintains the steepest yield curve among developed market rates. In our view, the case for continued policy normalization remains intact, despite domestic political uncertainties, as currency weakness increasingly fuels imported inflation.

China’s recovery, while gaining traction, remains uneven and fragile. Growth momentum is still weak, employment subdued, and deflationary pressures present. With U.S.–China trade tensions persisting, expectations for further fiscal stimulus continue to build, given that monetary easing alone has not been sufficient to reinvigorate activity. We believe additional fiscal measures will be essential to stabilizing growth.

More broadly, Asian markets appear resilient enough to withstand the initial geopolitical shock, with near‑term fundamentals largely intact. However, the longer‑term implications are harder to ignore. Asia is the world’s largest recipient of crude flows through the Strait of Hormuz—a chokepoint that becomes critical in conflict periods. Strategic reserves will help cushion disruptions, but can only slow—not prevent—the inflationary impact on living costs. Economies such as Thailand, India, and the Philippines are particularly vulnerable to sustained energy price increases; even moderate but persistent rises could push inflation higher from currently benign levels.

In this context, fiscal strength becomes an important buffer. Countries with healthier balance sheets and enough flexibility to deploy targeted subsidies or temporary support measures will be better equipped to soften the transmission of higher energy costs to households and businesses. These steps cannot fully remove inflationary pressures, but they can meaningfully mitigate them.

Credit

After a strong start to 2026 for Asian credit spreads, the recent geopolitical shock reminds us of underlying fragilities. We continue to see the risk‑reward profile as asymmetric, with heightened geopolitical tensions increasing the likelihood of abrupt risk‑off episodes. Although Asian credits overall remain resilient and carry remains the dominant driver of returns, pockets of the market exposed to oil prices and the middle east have become increasingly vulnerable to near‑term volatility.

In this environment, we remain highly selective—reducing exposure to weaker segments while favouring idiosyncratic issuers with robust fundamentals that can better withstand external shocks. Such issuers are still capable of delivering compelling risk‑adjusted returns, even as the broader geopolitical landscape becomes more unsettled.

Currencies

A stronger U.S. dollar is likely to remain the dominant theme as long as geopolitical tensions run high, with the currency’s path continuing to depend on the length and severity of the conflict in the Middle East. Should tensions ease, however, we expect the USD to weaken as underlying economic softness becomes more visible beneath the resilient headline figures. Political preference also matters: Trump’s inclination toward a weaker dollar reinforces this bias.

The euro stands to benefit most if U.S. outflows accelerate, supported by Europe’s commitment to fiscal expansion. While our long‑term view remains that the USD is structurally overvalued, we remain tactical in the near term on the back of near-term market volatility.

The Japanese yen presents a more nuanced outlook. While its recent weakness reflects Japan’s heavy reliance on imported energy, the currency proved relatively resilient during March’s risk-off environment, emerging as the strongest-performing G10 currency against the US dollar. A further unwinding of yen-funded carry trades—which have exerted sustained downward pressure on the currency—would be supportive of yen appreciation. Taken together, these dynamics suggest scope for a stronger yen over the longer term.

Source: First Sentier Investors, Bloomberg as at 31 March 2026

Important Information

This material is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute investment or financial advice and does not take into account any specific investment objectives, financial situation or needs. This is not an offer to provide asset management services, is not a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security or to execute any agreement for portfolio management or investment advisory services and this material has not been prepared in connection with any such offer. Before making any investment decision you should consider, with the assistance of a financial advisor, your individual investment needs, objectives and financial situation.

We have taken reasonable care to ensure that this material is accurate, current, and complete and fit for its intended purpose and audience as at the date of publication. No assurance is given or liability accepted regarding the accuracy, validity or completeness of this material and we do not undertake to update it in future if circumstances change.

To the extent this material contains any expression of opinion or forward-looking statements, such opinions and statements are based on assumptions, matters and sources believed to be true and reliable at the time of publication only. This material reflects the views of the individual writers only. Those views may change, may not prove to be valid and may not reflect the views of everyone at First Sentier Group.

About First Sentier Group

References to "we" or "us" are references to First Sentier Group. Certain of our investment teams operate under the trading names First Sentier Investors, FSSA Investment Managers, Stewart Investors, Igneo Infrastructure Partners and RQI Investors, all of which are part of the First Sentier Group. RQI branded strategies, investment products and services are not available in Germany.

In the EEA, issued by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited which is authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland (registered number C182306). Registered office: 70 Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland number 629188. In the UK, issued by First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registration number 143359). Registered office Finsbury Circus House, 15 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7EB number 2294743. Outside the UK and the EEA, issued by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number 122512).

Registered office: 23 St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 1BB number SC079063.

To the extent permitted by law, MUFG and its subsidiaries are not liable for any loss or damage as a result of reliance on any statement or information contained in this document. Neither MUFG nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of any investment products referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested. 

© First Sentier Group