At AlbaCore, we focus on the long-term. As one of Europe’s leading alternative credit specialists, we invest in private capital solutions, opportunistic and dislocated credit, and structured products. 

Discover more

Specialist in Asia Pacific, China, India and South East Asia and Global Emerging Market equities.

Discover more

Our philosophy is very simple. We are constantly searching for high quality businesses and when we acquire them, we will work relentlessly with them to create long-term sustainable value through innovation, ESG-led and proactive asset management.

Discover more

Leader in active quantitative equities across Australian equities, global equities, emerging markets and global small companies.

Backed by a unique blend of research, portfolio construction and risk management, focused on uncovering original insights and translating them into investment strategies that are active and systematic, aiming to generate alpha.

Discover more

Specialists in equity portfolios in Asia Pacific, emerging markets, global and sustainable investment strategies

Discover more

What makes a good responsible investment policy?

When First Sentier Investors updated our responsible investment (RI) policy two years ago, we knew it wouldn’t be a ‘set and forget’ task. The policy includes a mechanism to be reviewed at least every two years - but two years is a long time in the ESG world, and our latest review led to a number of important updates to the policy and its underlying approach.

The background

In 2020, First Sentier Investors undertook a comprehensive review of our existing policy suite and developed a single policy which built on and improved our approach, the Global Responsible Investment and Stewardship Principles and Policy (“the policy”).

The document articulates our approach to RI and what it means to us, and includes a set of guiding principles for investment team members as well as specific commitments in relation to ESG integration, corporate engagement, proxy voting and investment screens. Through this policy we communicate our approach to systemic issues such as climate change, natural capital and biodiversity, human rights and modern slavery, and diversity.

The policy was approved by the RI Steering Group in April 2020 following extensive consultation with the ESG Impacts Committee and other stakeholders in the business, and we felt proud that what we had achieved was market leading.

The rationale for change

The pace of regulatory change in ESG investment has been rapid, and we have seen different focuses and requirements in different countries. Stewardship codes and industry frameworks have evolved. There has been a strong focus on preventing greenwashing, and at the same time, investors have taken further steps to quantify and measure the contribution they are making to sustainable development.

Figure 1: Regulatory Change Timeline, Source: FSI, July 2022

Figure 1: Regulatory Change Timeline, Source: FSI, July 2022

For this reason, when we began the process of updating our policy in early 2021, we decided to make significant changes rather than cosmetic ones.

What has changed?

As part of this process we tried to answer the question: ‘what makes a good RI policy?’.

We also identified that there was a lot of positive RI activity, but some of it was not documented or codified. As such, we found that we needed to get really clear on topics including:

  • Our methods of engagement: engagement means different things to different people, and we wanted to be clear about the expectation for meaningful, ongoing engagement.
  • How engagement is prioritised: given the varying nature of the asset classes we manage, the geographies in which they operate and the size of our holdings, this looks different for different teams, but we wanted to be clear on the factors that are taken into account when prioritising and determining the scope of engagement activities.
  • What standards (regulations, codes and guidance) we were implementing: there is a growing list of standards that relate to and inform our RI activities, which we felt was important to recognise.
  • Remuneration of investment team members: integrating ESG risks and opportunities into the investment process has been integrated (either implicitly or explicitly) into our remuneration framework for some time, but we are trying to be more transparent about this.
  • How we monitor companies on an ongoing basis for ESG risks and opportunities: as we mentioned, nothing about RI is ‘set and forget’, especially the risks and opportunities faced by the companies we invest in, and we felt we needed to be explicit about this.

The outcome

At the end of the process, we had mapped out a framework of what we think best practice looks like. This thinking is captured below.

RI policy components

What does best practice look like?


Covers all investment professionals, as well as other departments as relevant.


Regulatory requirements or industry codes

References relevant regulatory requirements or industry codes the firm is subject to or seeks to comply with.



Organisational structure & oversight References the key governance structures, including reporting lines and in respect of committees, membership, responsibilities and meeting frequencies.
Resourcing & training Outlines what RI training is provided and to whom.
Conflicts of interest Comprehensively outlines the approach to managing conflicts of interest.

Policy principles

ESG considerations Defines and identifies the approach to identifying ESG risks and opportunities and systemic ESG issues.
Position statements States the firm’s position on key ESG issues of concern.

ESG integration

General approach Included under ‘What RI & Stewardship means to us’ section
Exclusions Articulates a framework for when and why the firm will introduce exclusions, and clearly explains any current exclusions. A list of excluded stocks meeting these requirements should be made publicly available.

Active ownership

General approach Included under ‘What RI & Stewardship means to us’ section
Engagement References:
  • Prioritisation and scope of engagement activities
  • Methods of engagement
  • Formal frameworks for tracking company progress on material ESG concerns
  • Detailed escalation strategy
 Voting References:
  • The decision making process
  • A position on filing or co-filing shareholder resolutions
  • Dialogue with companies pre- and post-vote
  • How potential and actual conflicts of interest in voting are managed
Policy advocacy and collaboration Articulates the position on policy advocacy and industry collaboration, when the firm will engage and on what topics.
Monitoring and reporting Articulates how progress will be monitored and reported in a structured & comprehensive way.
Transparency Provides detail of transparency related commitments, including details of reporting and how often it is updated/provided.
Oversight Provides detail on any oversight of the processes outlined above.
Remuneration Clearly articulates the link between ESG and remuneration, how this applies and to whom.
Review Has a minimum review period of 2 years, which in reality may not be often enough when there are changes in the market.

Important Information 

This document has been prepared for informational purposes only and is only intended to provide a summary of the subject matter covered. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to give advice. The views expressed are the views of the writer at the time of issue and may change over time. This is not an offer document and does not constitute an offer, invitation or investment recommendation to distribute or purchase securities, shares, units or other interests or to enter into an investment agreement. No person should rely on the content and/or act on the basis of any material contained in this document. 

This document is confidential and must not be copied, reproduced, circulated or transmitted, in whole or in part, and in any form or by any means without our prior written consent. The information contained within this document has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and accurate at the time of issue but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, or completeness of the information. We do not accept any liability whatsoever for any loss arising directly or indirectly from any use of this document. 

References to “we” or “us” are references to First Sentier Investors a member of MUFG, a global financial group. First Sentier Investors includes a number of entities in different jurisdictions. MUFG and its subsidiaries do not guarantee the performance of any investment or entity referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk including loss of income and capital invested.

If this document relates to an investment strategy which is available for investment via a UK UCITS but not an EU UCITS fund then that strategy will only be available to EU/EEA investors via a segregated mandate account.

In the United Kingdom, issued by First Sentier Investors (UK) Funds Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (registration number 143359). Registered office Finsbury Circus House, 15 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7EB number 2294743. In the EEA, issued by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited which is authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland (registered number C182306) in connection with the activity of receiving and transmitting orders. Registered office: 70 Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland number 629188. Outside the UK and the EEA, issued by First Sentier Investors International IM Limited which is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number 122512). Registered office: 23 St. Andrew Square, Edinburgh, EH2 1BB number SCO79063.

Copyright © (2022) First Sentier Investors

All rights reserved.